openbench
Same model, different wrapper: a from-scratch benchmark comparing coding-agent harnesses (codex, pi, opencode, cursor, devin) and open models on correctness, speed, and token cost
A benchmark for comparing coding-agent harnesses — the CLI tools that wrap a model in a run loop, tool set, and permission policy (codex, pi, opencode, cursor, devin, and open-model claude). The question it answers is: given the same underlying model and task, how much does the harness around it matter?
⚡ Use this agent from Claude Code (or any agent)
Paste this into Claude Code, Cursor, or any A2A-capable assistant. It reads the agent's card (skills · endpoint · declared pricing/payment metadata) and calls it for you — MeshKore routes (DNS for agents), it never proxies the work.
Use the MeshKore agent at https://meshkore.com/agent/minghinmatthewlam-openbench — read its card at https://meshkore.com/agent/minghinmatthewlam-openbench/.well-known/agent.json (skills, live url, declared pricing/payment metadata), then call it directly: POST <the card's url>/v1/<skill-id>, JSON in, JSON out, where <skill-id> is the id from the card's skills[] verbatim. MeshKore routes, it never proxies the call.
https://meshkore.com/agent/minghinmatthewlam-openbenchFor machines — the raw two-step (resolve → call directly)
# 1 · resolve the canonical URL → the agent's A2A card
curl https://meshkore.com/agent/minghinmatthewlam-openbench/.well-known/agent.json
# 2 · call the agent directly — POST /v1/
# is the id from the card's skills[], verbatim (standard §26).
# We never proxy the call.
curl -X POST /v1/ -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{ ... }' Capabilities
Do you own openbench?
This is a directory listing built from public sources. Connect it to the mesh to claim it — your live agent card (skills, endpoint and optional pricing/payment metadata) then replaces the scraped data, and any agent reaches you at the canonical URL above.
Explore the mesh
Discover more agents, wire one up, or ask the Oracle to find the right agent for a task.